|
return to Non-Fiction index
Film History Part I
page 4 of 5
The central plot is about a "mountebank monk" (hypnotist)
who opens a show at the fair in the town of Holstenwall. His act is a somnambulist
(hypnotized sleepwalker) who predicts people's deaths. A rash of murders
begin occuring after they arrive. Following the death of Francis' friend,
Alan, he begins to suspect Caligari. After Jane is attacked, but not killed,
she tells the police it was Cesare, the somnambulist, who tried to kill
her. Eventually Francis, after doing some investigations of his own, proves
to the police it is Caligari who is trying to master mind control and is
responsible. When confronted by the police and the body of Cesare (who
is found dead in a ravine), Caligari goes mad and is placed in a straight-jacket.
We return to the two men talking in the park, as Francis
finishes telling his story. It is now that we find Francis is an inmate
of an asylum run by the man who Francis claims to be Caligari. Now it is
Francis who is placed in a straight-jacket. The film ends with a shot of
the doctor followed by an intertitle which says "At last I recognize
his mania. He believes me to be the mythical Caligari. Astonishing! But
I think I know how to cure him now." Know how to cure him now? The
narrative leaves one pondering what has happened before that has inspired
such a tale, and is this respected director of an asylum partially responsible
for the torment this man's reality is experiencing. As Mast and Kawain
write about Dr. Caligari, "The central story is no simple tale
told by an idiot. If the kindly doctor is really not the demented Caligari,
why does it feel so creepy when he says at the very end, that he knows
"how to cure" Francis?"9
But the magic of Dr. Caligari is truly the set and
artistic direction of Warm, Rohrig, and Reimann. The feel of the scenes
is dread. There is an artistic beauty to the hillside where Francis chases
Cesare. Grass is multi-patterned spikes rising off the hill under a sinister
twisted tree. In the government office subtle political sentiments are
shown where Caligari must talk to an official who sits on an overly tall
pedestal overlooking his desk after climbing up a large ominous stairwell.
The whole town of Holstenwall is twisted and distored. "Hermann Warm,
the principle designer, belonged to a group that believed "films should
be drawings brought to life," and Caligari lives up to that
demand; it is an inhabited graphic world, an Expressionist visual conception
that moves."10
Although we see the extreme make-up and costuming, elaborate
lighting and set usage, German Expressionism does not try to uplift and
fascinate audiences with feats of magic like George Melies or dazzle and
mystify us with the color, fire, and fantasy like Segundo de Chomon. Instead
it uses these elements to create worlds far more illusive, the worlds of
the mind.
German Expressionism
Friedreich Wilhelm Murnau
Nosferatu (1922)
The Last Laugh (1924)
Fritz Lang
Metropolis (1925-1926)
German Expressionism only begins with The Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari. Throughout the 1920s German film and art directors continued
honing their art of expressing the darker side of emotion. In Murnau's
Nosferatu we find ourselves confronting vampires who command the
darker sides of nature itself. Film magic takes control as doors mysteriously
open by themselves and objects move about on their own. Murnau does not
rely on the harsh contrast in lighting seen in the works of Wiene or Lang,
instead the scenes are more even toned (gray-scaled appearance). This lack
of extreme contrast in no way takes from the dark dread of Dracula's castle
as it looms over us.
The Last Laugh is not based in the darker sides of
nature, but in the darker side of life in the cities, the influence of
authority and the fragile nature of social standings. Skyscrapers loom
upward shadowing the workers that serve the powers. This Murnau is visually
darker than Nosferatu, with deep contrasts and light play. As the
lead character gets drunk, the camera mirrors his view staggering the shot.
In one scene we see our lead in his employer's office from outside a window.
The camera view then "moves through the window" into the room.
As he reads a disheartening notice from his employer, his eyes tear up
as the camera's image is brought out of focus. The Last Laugh uses
the camera to bring you inside of the experiences of our lead character's
life. Once again it is the artistic beauty of the sets (which are all artificial
studio sets) which bring this film alive. An interesting fact is that this
film has only one intertitle which feels as out of place as the "tagged"
on ending the film has. But in defense of the odd happy ending, it does
leave us feeling better, yet does not diminish the reality we have just
experienced through our character's difficulties with his employment.
|